AHA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial)

CPR for Mechanical Circulatory Support

AHA GUIDELINES Apps brought to you courtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/869786

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 11

6 Diagnosis Cardiovascular Problems Î Continuous-flow devices account for the majority of durable LVADs implanted today. Most early generations of LVADs had pulsatile pumps. Intracorporeal pulsatile devices are no longer available commercially, but paracorporeal (the pump sits outside of the patient's body) pulsatile devices are still in use (Figure 3). Î The two most common causes of pump failure are disconnection of the power and failure of the driveline. Î There is a risk of de novo thrombus formation within the pump, which can cause hemolysis and a drop in flow. • Patients with MCS are usually anticoagulated with antiplatelet agents and warfarin, but there is still an increased risk of pump thrombosis, thromboembolism, and stroke despite therapeutic anticoagulation. Î Additional causes of poor pump flow are RV dysfunction, suboptimal pump orientation, or compromise of the inflow/outflow cannula. Î Preexisting RV dysfunction is common before LVAD implantation because of the effect of the primary cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, or both. Î Although significant new ischemic events or pulmonary emboli are rare in patients with an LVAD, tachyarrhythmias are common. Non-Cardiovascular Problems Î The most common adverse events during long-term mechanical support are infection (particularly in the driveline), bleeding, and stroke. Î It is important to understand the difference between blood flow and perfusion when assessing any patient with suspected cardiovascular hemodynamic instability, especially patients with an LVAD, in whom the peripheral arterial pulse is not a reliable indicator. • In patients without an LVAD, an MAP >60 mm Hg will usually still provide adequate tissue perfusion. • In the noninvasive assessment of the BP of a patient with a continuous- flow LVAD, use of a manual BP cuff and a Doppler is the recommended approach, with NIBP as a secondary option because of the limitations of NIBP assessment in this population. • Clinical findings such as skin color and capillary refill are reasonable predictors of the presence of adequate flow and perfusion, especially in MCS-supported pulseless patients.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of AHA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial) - CPR for Mechanical Circulatory Support