AAAAI & ACAAI GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial)

Urticaria

AAAAI & ACAAI GUIDELINES Apps brought to you free of charge courtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/786168

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 19 of 23

20 Alternative Therapies In Patients With CU Î Patients with CU whose symptoms are not adequately controlled on maximally tolerated antihistamine therapy (e.g., doxepin at a dose of 75–125 mg/d) might be considered to have refractory CU. (E) Î A number of alternative therapies have been studied for the treatment of CU. These therapies merit consideration for patients with refractory CU. (D) Î Anti-inflammatory agents, including dapsone, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and colchicine, have limited evidence for efficacy in patients with CU, and some require laboratory monitoring for adverse effects. (C) These agents are generally well tolerated, might be efficacious in properly selected patients, and can be considered for treatment of patients with antihistamine-refractory CU. (D) Immunosuppressant Agents Î Several immunosuppressant agents have been used in patients with antihistamine-refractory CU. Cyclosporine has been studied in several randomized controlled trials. Taken in the context of study limitations, potential harms, and cost, the quality of evidence supporting use of cyclosporine for refractory CUA is low. On the basis of current evidence, this leads to a weak recommendation for use of cyclosporine in patients with CUA refractory to conventional treatment. (A) Î Methotrexate: Experience with methotrexate in patients with CU is limited (C) to small case reports and case series. (C) Because of the limited evidence and potential for more serious adverse effects, use of methotrexate in patients with CU should be considered only in patients refractory to other anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressant, or other safer alternative agents. (D) Biologic Agents Î Omalizumab: In contrast to other alternative agents for refractory CU, the therapeutic utility of omalizumab has been supported by findings from large double-blind, randomized controlled trials and is associated with a relatively low rate of clinically significant adverse effects. On the basis of this evidence, omalizumab should be considered for refractory CU if, from an individualized standpoint, a therapeutic trial of omalizumab is favorable when balancing the potential for benefit with the potential for harm/burden and cost, and the decision to proceed is consistent with the patient's values and preferences. (A) Î Several biologic agents, IV immunoglobulin, and anti-TNF agents have been reported to be efficacious in patients with refractory CU. (C) Treatment

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of AAAAI & ACAAI GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial) - Urticaria