ICAR GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial)

Rhinology and Allergy Rhinosinusitis

ICAR IFAR GUIDELINES brought to you courtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/1512430

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 10 of 27

11 Cost Benefit-Harm Assessment Policy Level Moderate to High Benefits appear to outweigh harm Option: Corticosteroid-eluting implants can be considered as an option in a previously operated ethmoid cavity with recurrent nasal polyps High Likely benefit over harm in patients with CRSwNP not responsive to medical and surgical standard of care Recommendation: May be considered for patients with severe CRSwNP who have not improved despite other medical and surgical treatment options Low Benefits appear to outweigh harm Option: Macrolides are an option for patients with CRSsNP. Optimal drug, dosage, and treatment duration are not known Low Benefits appear to outweigh harm Option: Macrolides are likely beneficial in CRSwNP. Optimal drug, dosage, and treatment duration are not known Variable Preponderance of harm over benefits Recommendation against: Should generally not be prescribed for CRSwNP except in acute exacerbations Moderate to High Relative harm over benefit Recommendation against: Topical antibiotics are not recommended for CRSs/wNP Low to Moderate Minimal risk of harm but no apparent potential for benefit Strong recommendation against: Topical antifungals are not recommended for CRSs/wNP

Articles in this issue

view archives of ICAR GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial) - Rhinology and Allergy Rhinosinusitis