OMA Guidelines Bundle

Bariatric Surgery - OMA Obesity Algorithm 2023

Obesity Medicine Association OMA GUIDELINES App Bundle brought to you courtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/1349809

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 10 of 25

11 Bariatric Surgical Procedures Pros Cons Expected Excess Body weight Loss (EBWL) at 2 Years Optimally Suited for Patients With: Other Comments Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Greater improvement in metabolic disease and gastro- esophageal reflux disease (GERD) Increased risk of malabsorptive complications over sleeve 60–75% Higher BMI, GERD, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) Largest data set Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (VSG) Improves metabolic disease; micronutrient deficiencies inf requent Can worsen GERD and Barrett's esophagus 50–70% (3-year data a ) Metabolic disease Currently most common procedure performed Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) Least invasive; removable Limited efficacy and any metabolic benefits achieved are dependent on weight loss 30–50% Lower BMI; no metabolic disease Performance has declined and removal rate of at least 25 percent at five years Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS) Greatest amount of weight loss and resolution of metabolic disease Increased risk macro- and micronutrient deficiencies over bypass 70–80% Higher BMI, Type 2 DM Most technically challenging Loop Duodenal Switch May be simpler and safer than BD-DS with less micronutrient deficiencies Long-term data not available 70–80% Higher BMI, Type 2 DM Two step procedure: VSG followed by single anastomosis a Excess body weight (EBW) = (total body weight) – (lean body weight)

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of OMA Guidelines Bundle - Bariatric Surgery - OMA Obesity Algorithm 2023