Gastroparesis

ANMS Gastroparesis

Gastroparesis Guidelines Apps brought to you courtesy of Guideline Central & ANMS. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/87773

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 11

Table 3. Comparison of Methods Used to Assess Gastric Emptying Scintigraphya Mechanisms of gastric emptying Validation Studies Radiation exposure Reproducibility (CV%)c Limitations for testing Assessment of antral contractility Assessment of small bowel and colonic transit c Antral motor activity Extensive Yes inter – 24% intra – 12% Pregnancy Feasible Yes Wireless Motility Capsuleb Antral motor activity and migrating motor complex activity Modest No Not studied Obstruction Yes Yes a Obtain scans at 1, 2, and 4 hours to accurately estimate gastric emptying by scintigraphy. b Using a 5 h cutoff for gastric emptying, capsule discriminates between normal and delayed gastric emptying with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.92. CV% - percentage coefficient of variation. Inter and intra – inter- and intra-individual coefficient of variation. Table 4. Strengths and Limitations of Imaging Techniques for Measuring Gastric Volumes Strengths Technique SPECT Ultrasound MRI Limitations • Extensively validated • Can be combined with scintigraphy to assess gastric emptying • No radiation • Can also assess antral contractility and pyloric flow • No radiation • Validated • Can also assess gastric air and fluid volumes, contractility, secretion, and emptying • Radiation exposure • Limited temporal and spatial resolution • Presence of air may limit visualization, especially in the fundus • Highly operator-dependent • Expense and limited availability

Articles in this issue

view archives of Gastroparesis - ANMS Gastroparesis