IDSA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial)

Antibiotic Stewardship 2016

IDSA GUIDELINES Apps brought to you free of charge courtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/662041

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 7

Microbiology and Laboratory Diagnostics Î We suggest development of stratified antibiograms over solely relying on nonstratified antibiograms to assist ASPs in developing guidelines for empiric therapy (W-L). • Stratification can expose important differences in susceptibility, which can help ASPs develop optimized treatment recommendations and guidelines. Î We suggest selective and cascade reporting of antibiotics over reporting of all tested antibiotics (W-L). • Some form of selective or cascaded reporting is reasonable. After implementation, ASPs should review prescribing to ensure there are no unintended consequences. Î We suggest the use of rapid viral testing for respiratory pathogens to reduce the use of inappropriate antibiotics (W-L). Î We suggest rapid diagnostic testing in addition to conventional culture and routine reporting on blood specimens if combined with active ASP support and interpretation (W-M). Î In adults in ICUs with suspected infection, we suggest the use of serial procalcitonin measurements as an ASP intervention to decrease antibiotic use (W-M). Î In patients with hematologic malignancy at risk of contracting invasive fungal disease, we suggest incorporating nonculture-based fungal markers in ASP interventions to optimize antifungal use (W-L). Measurement Î We suggest monitoring antibiotic use as measured by days of therapy (DOT) in preference to defined daily dose (DDD) (W-L). • Every ASP must measure antibiotic use, stratified by antibiotic. DOTs are preferred, but DDDs remain an alternative for sites that cannot obtain patient- level antibiotic use data. ASPs should consider measurement of appropriate antibiotic use within their own institutions by examining compliance with local or national guidelines, particularly when assessing results of a targeted intervention, and share that data with clinicians to help inform their practice. Although rates of CDI or antibiotic resistance may not reflect ASP impact, those outcomes may also be used for measurement of targeted interventions. Î We recommend measuring antibiotic costs based on prescriptions or administrations instead of purchasing data (GPR). Î Measures that consider the goals and size of the syndrome-specific intervention should be used (See Table 2) (GPR).

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of IDSA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial) - Antibiotic Stewardship 2016