IDSA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial)

Aspergillosis 2016

IDSA GUIDELINES Apps brought to you free of charge courtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/57608

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 11 of 23

11 Treatment Breakthrough Infection Î The IDSA suggests an individualized approach that takes into consideration the rapidity and severity of infection and local epidemiology (W-M). • As principles, the IDSA recommends an aggressive and prompt attempt to establish a specific diagnosis with bronchoscopy and/or CT-guided biopsy for peripheral lung lesions. • Documentation of serum azole levels should be verified if TDM is available for patients receiving mold-active triazoles. • Antifungal therapy should be empirically changed to an alternative class of antifungal with Aspergillus activity. • Other considerations include reduction of underlying immunosuppression, if feasible, and susceptibility testing of any Aspergillus isolates recovered from the patient. Empirical and Pre-emptive Strategies Î Empirical antifungal therapy is recommended for high-risk patients with prolonged neutropenia who remain persistently febrile despite broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy (S-H). • Antifungal options include a lipid formulation of AmB (S-H), an echinocandin (caspofungin or micafungin) (S-H), or voriconazole (S-M). Î Empirical antifungal therapy is NOT recommended for patients who are anticipated to have short durations of neutropenia (duration of neutropenia <10 days), unless other findings indicate a suspected invasive fungal infection (S-M). Î The use of serum or BAL fungal biomarkers such as GM or (1→3)-β-D- glucan to guide antifungal therapy in asymptomatic or febrile high risk patients (often referred to as pre-emptive or biomarker-driven antifungal therapy) can reduce unnecessary antifungal therapy (S-M). • The pre-emptive approach can result in more documented cases of IA without compromise in survival and can be used as an alternative to empirical antifungal therapy. Î Early initiation of antifungal therapy in patients with strongly suspected IPA is warranted while a diagnostic evaluation is conducted (S-M). Î Management of suspected or documented breakthrough IPA in the context of mold-active azole prophylaxis or empirical suppressive therapy is not defined by clinical trial data, but a switch to another drug class is suggested (W-L).

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of IDSA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial) - Aspergillosis 2016