ELS - VHD and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Valvular Heart Disease - Aortic Stenosis

ACCF Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement GUIDELINES App brought to you free of charge courtesy of Guideline Central. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/396184

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 6 of 11

Table 7. Indications for AVR in Patients With AS (cont'd) Recommendations COR LOE AVR is reasonable in symptomatic patients with low-flow/ low-gradient severe AS (stage D3) with LVEF ≥50%, a calcified aortic valve with significantly reduced leaflet motion, and a valve area ≤1.0 cm 2 only if clinical, hemodynamic, and anatomic data support valve obstruction as the most likely cause of symptoms and data recorded when the patient is normotensive (systolic BP <140 mm Hg ) indicate: • An aortic velocity <4 m/s or ∆Pmean <40 mm Hg ; • A stroke volume index <35 mL/m 2 ; and • An indexed valve area ≤0.6 cm 2 /m 2 . IIa C AVR is reasonable for patients with moderate AS (stage B) with an aortic velocity 3.0-3.9 m/s or ∆Pmean 20-39 mm Hg who are undergoing cardiac surgery for other indications. IIa C AVR may be considered for asymptomatic patients with severe AS (stage C1) with aortic velocity ≥4.0 m/s or ∆Pmean ≥40 mm Hg if the patient is at low surgical risk and serial testing shows an increase in aortic velocity ≥0.3 m/s/y. IIb C Table 8. Choice of Intervention in Patients With AS Recommendations COR LOE Surgical AVR is recommended in patients who meet an indication for AVR with low or intermediate surgical risk. I A For patients in whom TAVR or high-risk surgical AVR is being considered, a Heart Valve Team consisting of an integrated, multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals with expertise in VHD, cardiac imaging, interventional cardiolog y, cardiac anesthesia, and cardiac surgery should collaborate to provide optimal patient care. I C TAVR is recommended in patients who meet an indication for AVR who have a prohibitive risk for surgical AVR and a predicted post-TAVR survival >12 months. I B TAVR is a reasonable alternative to surgical AVR in patients who meet an indication for AVR and who have high surgical risk for surgical AVR. IIa B Percutaneous aortic balloon dilation may be considered as a bridge to surgical AVR or TAVR in patients with severe symptomatic AS. IIb C TAVR is NOT recommended in patients in whom existing comorbidities would preclude the expected benefit from correction of AS. III: No Benefit B

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of ELS - VHD and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - Valvular Heart Disease - Aortic Stenosis