Mitral Regurgitation - Valvular Heart Disease Guidelines

Valvular Heart Disease

ACC/AHA Valvular Heart Disease - Mitral Regurgitation GUIDELINES Apps brought to you charge courtesy of Guideline Central and Abbott Vascular.

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/362036

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 11 of 59

10 Aortic Stenosis Table 11. Indications for AVR in Patients With AS (cont'd) Recommendations COR LOE AVR is reasonable in symptomatic patients with low-flow/ low-gradient severe AS (stage D3) with LVEF ≥50%, a calcified aortic valve with significantly reduced leaflet motion, and a valve area ≤1.0 cm 2 only if clinical, hemodynamic, and anatomic data support valve obstruction as the most likely cause of symptoms and data recorded when the patient is normotensive (systolic BP <140 mm Hg ) indicate: • An aortic velocity <4 m/s or ∆Pmean <40 mm Hg ; • A stroke volume index <35 mL/m 2 ; and • An indexed valve area ≤0.6 cm 2 /m 2 . IIa C AVR is reasonable for patients with moderate AS (stage B) with an aortic velocity 3.0-3.9 m/s or ∆Pmean 20-39 mm Hg who are undergoing cardiac surgery for other indications. IIa C AVR may be considered for asymptomatic patients with severe AS (stage C1) with aortic velocity ≥4.0 m/s or ∆Pmean ≥40 mm Hg if the patient is at low surgical risk and serial testing shows an increase in aortic velocity ≥0.3 m/s/y. IIb C Table 12. Choice of Intervention in Patients With AS Recommendations COR LOE Surgical AVR is recommended in patients who meet an indication for AVR with low or intermediate surgical risk. I A For patients in whom TAVR or high-risk surgical AVR is being considered, a Heart Valve Team consisting of an integrated, multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals with expertise in VHD, cardiac imaging, interventional cardiolog y, cardiac anesthesia, and cardiac surgery should collaborate to provide optimal patient care. I C TAVR is recommended in patients who meet an indication for AVR who have a prohibitive risk for surgical AVR and a predicted post-TAVR survival >12 months. I B TAVR is a reasonable alternative to surgical AVR in patients who meet an indication for AVR and who have high surgical risk for surgical AVR. IIa B Percutaneous aortic balloon dilation may be considered as a bridge to surgical AVR or TAVR in patients with severe symptomatic AS. IIb C TAVR is NOT recommended in patients in whom existing comorbidities would preclude the expected benefit from correction of AS. III: No Benefit B

Articles in this issue

view archives of Mitral Regurgitation - Valvular Heart Disease Guidelines - Valvular Heart Disease