AHA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial)

AHA/ASA Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2026

AHA GUIDELINES Apps brought to you courtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/1542862

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 30 of 57

31 Table 6. Other Situations Wherein Thrombolysis is Deemed to be Considered Conditions that are relative contraindications Pre-existing disability The benefits vs risks of offering IV thrombolysis in patients with pre-existing disability and/or frailty remain uncertain. Treatment should be determined on an individual basis. DOAC exposure In patients with disabling symptoms and recent DOAC exposure (<48 hours) who are within the window for alteplase/tenecteplase, the safety of IV thrombolysis is unknown. Emerging but limited observational data suggest IV thrombolysis may be considered after a thorough benefit vs risk analysis on an individual basis. Benefit vs risk assessments should include considering the timing of the latest DOAC administration, renal function, stroke severity, and availability of endovascular thrombectomy as well as availability of DOAC reversal agents and DOAC-specific anti-factor Xa/ thrombin time assays acknowledging the potential for delay in thrombolysis and potential increased thrombotic risk. All aspects of DOAC management (timing, reversal agent use, assay results), should be recorded carefully to facilitate ongoing safety analyses. Definitive clinical trials are needed to establish the safety of IV thrombolysis in DOAC patients. Ischemic stroke w/in 3 months Use of IV thrombolysis in patients presenting with AIS who have had a prior ischemic stroke within 3 months may be at increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Potential increased risk as a result of the timing and size of the stroke should be weighed against the benefits of offering IV thrombolysis in an individualized manner in such patients. Prior ICH IV thrombolysis administration in patients who have a history of ICH may increase the risk of symptomatic hemorrhage. Patients with known amyloid angiopathy may be considered as having higher risk than patients with ICH due to modifiable conditions (eg, HTN, coagulopathy). IV thrombolysis may have greater treatment benefit than risk in these latter patients. Treatment should be determined on an individual basis. Recent major non-CNS trauma (between 14 days and 3 months) Patients with recent major trauma between 14 days and 3 months of their AIS may be at increased risk of harm and serious systemic hemorrhage requiring transfusion from IV thrombolysis. Individual consideration of risk vs benefit, involved areas, and consultation with surgical experts are appropriate. (cont'd)

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of AHA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial) - AHA/ASA Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2026