HRS Guidelines Bundle (free trial)

Evaluation and Management of Arrhythmic Risk in Neuromuscular Disorders

Heart Rhythm Society GUIDELINES Apps brought to you free pf charge, courtesy of Guideline Central. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/1499527

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 30 of 49

31 Management strategies Key points • Management options discussed centered on the risks and benefits of the generator exchange procedure and the alternatives to not having generator change. • EDMD2 puts him at high risk for the development of potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. • The patient had not had any shocks, and his pacing requirements were minimal. • Discussion of his reluctance for ICD generator exchange centered on the risk and on the risks and benefits of the procedure and the alternatives to not having generator change. • ICD generator change was ultimately deferred based on shared decision making. • Patients with EDMD2 are at high risk for the development of potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. • Patients with NMDs who have implantable devices need to be counseled about the need for device and long-term maintenance prior to implantation. • Eliciting the patient's overall medical care goals and preferences with consideration of the individual's neuromuscular prognosis is recommended when the option of discontinuing device therapy is present. • Generator change presents an opportunity to discuss goals of care and patient preferences including their desire to downgrade or avoid CIED therapy. • Management options discussed included anticoagulation and device placement (ICD versus pacemaker) due to AV block. • Continued cardiovascular medical therapy was recommended regardless of arrhythmia management strategy due to risk of CM. • Values elicited in discussion included options to preserve quality of life and desire for protection against stroke and sudden cardiac death. • Therapy with warfarin was begun with plans for ICD placement. • Upon arrival for ICD placement, the patient was in complete AV block. ICD implantation was successfully performed. • Due to lack of representation of pediatric patients with NMDs in previously published trials of anticoagulation for atrial arrhythmias and single-chamber ICD placement, extrapolation of data from adults was required in conjunction with clinical decision making. • Family history of progression of EDMD to CM requiring transplant at 17 years of age was factored into decision making. • Anticoagulation is warranted due to scarred atria with incessant arrhythmia and poor atrial transport as a nidus for thrombus. • As direct oral anticoagulants are not approved for use in children, warfarin was prescribed.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of HRS Guidelines Bundle (free trial) - Evaluation and Management of Arrhythmic Risk in Neuromuscular Disorders