ASCO GUIDELINES Bundle

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients with Cancer

ASCO GUIDELINES App Bundle brought to you fcourtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/1475509

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 3 of 11

4 Treatment ➤ 4.2. For long-term anticoagulation, LMWH, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban for at least 6 months are preferred because of improved efficacy over vitamin K antagonists (VKA). VKA are inferior but may be utilized if LMWH or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are not accessible. There is an increase in major bleeding risk with DOAC, particularly observed in GI and potentially GU malignancies. Caution with DOAC is also warranted in other settings with high risk for mucosal bleeding. Drug-drug interaction should be checked prior to using a DOAC. (Strong Recommendation; EB-H) ➤ 4.3. Anticoagulation with LMWH, DOAC, or VKA beyond the initial 6 months should be offered to select patients with active cancer, such as those with metastatic disease or those receiving chemotherapy. Anticoagulation beyond 6 months needs to be assessed on an intermittent basis to ensure a continued favorable risk-benefit profile. (Weak to Moderate Recommendation; IC-L) ➤ 4.4. Based on expert opinion in the absence of randomized trial data, uncertain short-term benefit, and mounting evidence of long-term harm from filters, the insertion of a vena cava filter should not be offered to patients with established or chronic thrombosis (VTE diagnosis more than 4 weeks ago) nor to patients with temporary contraindications to anticoagulant therapy (e.g., surgery). There also is no role for filter insertion for primary prevention or prophylaxis of PE or DVT due to its long-term harm concerns. It may be offered to patients with absolute contraindications to anticoagulant therapy in the acute treatment setting (VTE diagnosis within the past 4 weeks) if the thrombus burden was considered life-threatening. Further research is needed. (Moderate Recommendation; IC-L/I) ➤ 4.5. The insertion of a vena cava filter may be offered as an adjunct to anticoagulation in patients with progression of thrombosis (recurrent VTE or extension of existing thrombus) despite optimal anticoagulant therapy. (Weak Recommendation; IC-L/I) • This is based on the panel's expert opinion, given the absence of a survival improvement, a limited short-term benefit, but mounting evidence of the long-term increased risk for VTE. ➤ 4.6. For patients with primary or metastatic central nervous system malignancies and established VTE, anticoagulation as described for other patients with cancer should be offered, although uncertainties remain about choice of agents and selection of patients most likely to benefit. (Moderate Recommendation; IC-L)

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of ASCO GUIDELINES Bundle - Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients with Cancer