SVS Guidelines Bundle

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

SVS GUIDELINES App Bundle brought to you fcourtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/1309717

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 18 of 23

19 Summary of Recommendations Recommendation Grade/ LOE 6.23 Restage the limb and repeat the hemodynamic assessment aer performing inflow correction in CLTI patients with inflow and outflow disease. 1-C 6.24 Consider simultaneous inflow and outflow revascularization in CLTI patients with a high limb risk (eg, WIf I stages 3 and 4), or in patients with severe ischemia (eg, WIf I ischemia grades 2 and 3). 2-C 6.25 Use an endovascular-first approach for treatment of CLTI patients with moderate to severe (eg, GLASS stage IA) AI disease, depending on the history of prior intervention. 1-B 6.26 Consider surgical reconstruction for the treatment of average-risk CLTI patients with extensive (eg, GLASS stage II) AI disease or aer failed endovascular intervention. 2-C 6.27 Perform open CFA endarterectomy with patch angioplasty, with or without extension into the PFA, in CLTI patients with hemodynamically significant (>50% stenosis) disease of the common and deep femoral arteries. 1-C 6.28 Consider a hybrid procedure combining open CFA endarterectomy and endovascular treatment of AI disease with concomitant CFA involvement (GLASS stage IB). 2-C 6.29 Consider endovascular treatment of significant CFA disease in selected patients who are deemed to be at high surgical risk or to have a hostile groin. 2-C 6.30 Avoid stents in the CFA and do NOT place stents across the origin of a patent deep femoral artery. GPS 6.31 Correct hemodynamically significant (≥50% stenosis) disease of the proximal deep femoral artery whenever technically feasible. GPS 6.32 In average-risk CLTI patients with infrainguinal disease, base decisions of endovascular intervention vs. open surgical bypass on the severity of limb threat (eg, WIf I), the anatomic pattern of disease (eg, GLASS), and the availability of autologous vein. 1-C 6.33 Offer endovascular revascularization when technically feasible for high-risk patients with advanced limb threat (eg, WIf I stage 4) and significant perfusion deficits (eg, WIf I ischemia grades 2 and 3). 2-C 6.34 Consider endovascular revascularization for high-risk patients with intermediate limb threat (eg, WIf I stages 2 and 3) and significant perfusion deficits (eg, WIf I ischemia grades 2 and 3). 2-C

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of SVS Guidelines Bundle - Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia