ELS - VHD and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

ACCF Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement GUIDELINES App brought to you free of charge courtesy of Guideline Central. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/109740

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 9

Treatment ����Participation in national TAVR registries is recommended. ����At the present time, the most data available for TAVR are based upon 2 specific devices (see J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(13):1200-54. PMID: 22300974 for details). ����Patient selection criteria in trials (details in Holmes DR et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(13):1200-54.): ������ Symptomatic native tricuspid aortic valve stenosis deemed operable by multiple factors. ������ Risk outweighs benefit from surgical AVR. ������ Benefit outweighs risk from TAVR. ����Registries to date demonstrate that TAVR in high-risk patients may be deployed with a high degree of procedural success, predictable risk of stroke, device-dependent high risk of pacemaker implantation (particularly with CoreValve), and a 30-day mortality rate acceptable in severely debilitated and ill patient populations. Importantly, TAVR seems to alleviate AS to a similar degree as surgical AVR, and patients tend to return to Class I or II symptoms with substantial improvements in quality of life. ����Early mortality ranges from an in-hospital rate of 5%-8% and a 30-day mortality rate from 8%-10%. Other complications vary and include stroke, vascular access injury, and pacemaker implantation.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of ELS - VHD and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement