AHA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial)

Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

AHA GUIDELINES Apps brought to you courtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/102913

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 18 of 45

17 Î CMR with pharmacological stress is reasonable for risk assessment in patients with SIHD who are able to exercise to an adequate workload but have an uninterpretable ECG. (IIa-B) Î CCTA may be reasonable for risk assessment in patients with SIHD who are able to exercise to an adequate workload but have an uninterpretable ECG. (IIb-B) Î Pharmacological stress imaging (nuclear MPI, echocardiography, or CMR) or CCTA is NOT recommended for risk assessment in patients with SIHD who are able to exercise to an adequate workload and have an interpretable ECG. (III-C: No Benefit) Risk Assessment In Patients Unable To Exercise Î Pharmacological stress with either nuclear MPI or echocardiography is recommended for risk assessment in patients with SIHD who are unable to exercise to an adequate workload regardless of interpretability of ECG. (I-B) Î Pharmacological stress CMR is reasonable for risk assessment in patients with SIHD who are unable to exercise to an adequate workload regardless of interpretability of ECG. (IIa-B) Î CCTA can be useful as a first-line test for risk assessment in patients with SIHD who are unable to exercise to an adequate workload regardless of interpretability of ECG. (IIa-C) Risk Assessment Regardless Of Patients' Ability To Exercise Î Pharmacological stress with either nuclear MPI or echocardiography is recommended for risk assessment in patients with SIHD who have LBBB on ECG, regardless of ability to exercise to an adequate workload. (I-B) Î Either exercise or pharmacological stress with imaging (nuclear MPI, echocardiography, or CMR) is recommended for risk assessment in patients with SIHD who are being considered for revascularization of known coronary stenosis of unclear physiological significance. (I-B) Î CCTA can be useful for risk assessment in patients with SIHD who have an indeterminate result from functional testing. (IIa-C) Î CCTA might be considered for risk assessment in patients with SIHD unable to undergo stress imaging or as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography when functional testing indicates a moderate- to high-risk result and angiographic coronary anatomy is unknown. (IIb-C) ÎA request to perform either a) more than 1 stress imaging study or b) a stress imaging study and a CCTA at the same time is NOT recommended for risk assessment in patients with SIHD. (III-C: No Benefit)

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of AHA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial) - Stable Ischemic Heart Disease