IDSA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial)

Diagnosis of TB Guidelines PDF

IDSA GUIDELINES Apps brought to you free of charge courtesy of Guideline Central. All of these titles are available for purchase on our website, GuidelineCentral.com. Enjoy!

Issue link: http://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/847015

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 10 of 11

11 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-Based Recommendations Implications for: Strong Recommendation (S) Conditional Recommendation (C) Patients Most individuals in this situation would want the recommended course of action, and only a small proportion would not. e majority of individuals in this situation would want the suggested course of action, but many would not. Clinicians Most individuals should receive the intervention. Adherence to this recommendation according to the guideline could be used as a quality criterion or performance indicator. Formal decision aids are not likely to be needed to help individuals make decisions consistent with their values and preferences. Recognize that different choices will be appropriate for individual patients and that you must help each patient arrive at a management decision consistent with his or her values and preferences. Decision aids may be useful in helping individuals to make decisions consistent with their values and preferences. Policy e recommendation can be adopted as policy in most situations. Policymaking will require substantial debate and involvement of various stakeholders. Certainty in the Evidence High H Low L Moderate M Very Low VL Source: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (Schunemann HJ et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:605–14. Guyatt GH et al. BMJ 2008; 336:924–6). S, strong ; C, conditional; H, high; M, moderate; L, low; VL, very low quality of evidence

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of IDSA GUIDELINES Bundle (free trial) - Diagnosis of TB Guidelines PDF