ATS GUIDELINES Bundle

Managing Requests for Inappropriate Therapies

American Thoracic Society Quick-Reference GUIDELINES Apps

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/592878

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 2 of 9

Recommendations Recommendation 1 Î Institutions should implement strategies to prevent intractable treatment conflicts, including proactive communication and early involvement of expert consultation. Recommendation 2 Î The term "potentially inappropriate" should be used, rather than "futile," to describe treatments that have at least some chance of accomplishing the effect sought by the patient, but clinicians believe that competing ethical considerations justify not providing them. Clinicians should communicate and advocate for the treatment plan they believe is appropriate. Requests for potentially inappropriate treatment that remain intractable despite intensive communication and negotiation should be managed by a fair process of dispute resolution. • The committee recommends the following approach to manage such cases: 1. Enlist expert consultation to continue negotiation during the dispute resolution process 2. Give notice of the process to surrogates 3. Obtain a second medical opinion 4. Obtain review by an interdisciplinary hospital committee 5. Offer surrogates the opportunity to transfer the patient to an alternate institution 6. Inform surrogates of the opportunity to pursue extramural appeal 7. Implement the decision of the resolution process • When time pressures (such as a rapidly deteriorating clinical condition) make it infeasible to complete all steps of the conflict-resolution process and clinicians have a high degree of certainty that the requested treatment is outside accepted practice, they should refuse to provide the requested treatment and endeavor to achieve as much procedural oversight as the clinical situation allows.

Articles in this issue

view archives of ATS GUIDELINES Bundle - Managing Requests for Inappropriate Therapies