ATS GUIDELINES Bundle

Sarcoidosis

American Thoracic Society Quick-Reference GUIDELINES Apps

Issue link: https://eguideline.guidelinecentral.com/i/1279655

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 18 of 19

19 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-Based Recommendations Implications for: Strong Recommendation Conditional Recommendation Patients Most patients in this situation would want the recommended intervention. e majority of individuals in this situation would want the suggested intervention, but many would not. Clinicians Most patients should receive the recommended course of action. Different choices will be appropriate for different patients, and that the clinician must help each patient arrive at a management decision consistent with her or his values and preferences. Policy Makers e recommendation can be adapted as policy in most situations including for the use as performance indicators. Policies are also more likely to vary between regions/health systems. Performance indicators would have to focus on the fact that adequate deliberation about the management options has taken place. Certainty in the Evidence High We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: e true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: e true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very Low We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: e true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

Articles in this issue

view archives of ATS GUIDELINES Bundle - Sarcoidosis